|
Use AI in ways that protect student identity, not erase it.
This eighth installment of the Teaching Writing in the Age of AI series explores the risk of generative AI "flattening" student identity and voice by bypassing the essential, messy process of self-authorship in writing. To counter this, I propose three strategies for using AI as a scaffold—crafting self-inviting prompts, exploring multi-modal translations, and acting as an "identity mirror"—to ensure technology amplifies rather than erases the human writer.
In my previous article, Writing is Identity Building, I explored how writing serves as a site for self-authorship and identity construction. Drawing on Dr. Rudine Sims Bishop’s foundational metaphor, I argued that writing can function as a "mirror," allowing students to see their own lives and experiences reflected back. By prioritizing voice and choice—as supported by scholars like Mary Ryan—we move beyond "boring," mechanical prompts toward a pedagogy that treats writing as a series of personal decisions about how students construct and represent themselves to the world.
Building on this foundation, the accessibility of generative AI introduces a significant risk of automation that can undermine these aims. When students rely on AI to generate text, they risk adopting a "robotic and flattened style" that abandons their unique voice and linguistic rhythm. This "flattening" effect often occurs because AI models are trained on vast datasets that can amplify Western-centric viewpoints, potentially erasing the cultural and linguistic rhythms that make individual student voices vital. Instead of the active "meaning-making" and self-affirmation found in authentic writing, an over-reliance on AI may lead to a loss of agency, where the tool misrepresents the student's personal values and diminishes the relational connection between the writer and their audience. And, by bypassing the "messy middle" of composition, students may inadvertently opt out of the very process where identity is explored and constructed. In this article, I propose three ways that generative AI can move from a tool of generic imitation to a scaffold for identity building and imagination. Using AI to Craft Self-Inviting Prompts
Teachers can leverage AI chatbots to help craft "self-inviting" prompts, then choose the very best ones that they think will connect with their specific students, ensuring the writing invitations remain grounded in their students’ own experiences, values, and identities.
Example Prompts for Teachers
Using AI to Play with Multiple Modalities
The idea here is simple: when we change the way we share information, we change how people understand it. Moving an idea from a written page into a new format—like a podcast, a script, or a visual guide—forces us to think more deeply about what we are trying to say and who we are saying it to. Both teachers and students can use AI to do this "translation" work.
For a teacher, it’s a way to take a difficult topic and deliver it in a way that feels more like a story. For a student, hearing their own essay turned into a podcast helps them realize, "Oh, that part of my argument actually sounds a bit confusing," or "I didn't realize that point was so important!" Example Prompts
Using AI as an Identity Mirror
Instead of asking the AI to write for you, you are asking the AI to look at what you’ve already written and tell you what it sees. This helps students (and teachers!) build a sense of authorial identity. It’s about finding your "style" and seeing how it fits into the wider world of literature and ideas.
Example Prompts
The proposed goal of integrating these generative AI prompts into the writing classroom is not to simplify the process, but to help human beings in their journeys of identity building. By using these tools as bridges to relevance, play for new modalities, and mirrors for self-reflection, we ensure that technology serves the student's voice rather than erasing it.
When we move away from the "flattening" effect of automation and toward these intentional, identity-building engagements, we protect the "messy middle" of composition where true meaning-making happens. AI becomes a powerful collaborator that helps students and teachers see themselves more clearly, allowing them to navigate the curriculum not just as consumers of information, but as authors of their own unique stories.
|
|


