Four Lenses for Seeing Your Curriculum Differently

Four frameworks to help you rethink your curriculum, reveal hidden values, and bridge the gap between mandates and classroom reality.

In conversation with

• Host: Dr. Roberta Lenger Kang
• Guest: Dr. Jacqui Stolzer
• Panelist: Dr. Cristina Compton

---

Snapshot

In this episode, Dr. Roberta Lenger Kang and Dr. Cristina Compton speak with Dr. Jacqui Stolzer about her dissertation research on curriculum ideologies. The conversation explores the common challenges teachers face—from having too little curriculum guidance to being overwhelmed by scripted programs—and introduces Michael Schiro's four curriculum ideologies as a framework for understanding the values and beliefs that shape curricular decisions. The discussion bridges theory and practice by examining how teachers can use these ideologies as lenses to critically reflect on their curriculum work and navigate the tensions between their own values and institutional demands.

Teachers are not given the support, space, or conceptual tools for deliberating about curriculum or curricular choices in any meaningful way.  How can teachers explore and deliberate about the deeper meaning of curriculum in a way that actually informs their classroom? What are some ways of understanding the philosophies and ideologies that undergird curriculum in schools that can connect to and inform curricular actions and choices?

In my research, I introduced a framework of "curriculum ideologies" to preservice and early career English teachers as a way to support them in making sense of their own curriculum values. While I ultimately concluded that this framework needs to be complicated, I believe that the four curriculum “archetypes” — Scholar Academic, Social Efficiency, Learner Centered, Social Reconstruction — can be helpful lenses in helping teachers understand the curriculum they inherit, adapt, and create.

— Dr. Jacqui Stolzer

---

---

Breakdown

In this episode, we bridge theory and practice in the classroom as we discuss the following:

• The spectrum of curriculum challenges teachers face, from insufficient guidance to overwhelming scripted programs
• Four curriculum ideologies as frameworks for understanding different visions of education
• Using curriculum ideologies as lenses for critical reflection and navigating professional tensions

The spectrum of curriculum challenges teachers face, from insufficient guidance to overwhelming scripted programs.
Teachers often find themselves at extremes when it comes to curriculum support. Some receive almost nothing—perhaps just a list of books or a paragraph description —leaving them to figure out what and how to teach on their own. Others face the opposite problem: scripted curricula that dictate exactly what to say and when, leaving little room for professional judgment or responsiveness to students. Whether facing too little or too much, teachers frequently lack the space, tools, and support to meaningfully deliberate about curriculum and make informed instructional choices that align with their values and students' needs.

Four curriculum ideologies as frameworks for understanding different visions of education.
Dr. Stolzer's research draws on Michael Schiro's four curriculum ideologies: scholar academic (focused on disciplinary knowledge and acculturating students to academic fields), social efficiency (preparing students for society as it currently exists, emphasizing practical skills and procedural curriculum design), learner-centered (prioritizing student interests, experiences, and self-actualization), and social reconstruction (preparing students to critically examine and transform society to address injustices). These archetypes aren't rigid categories but rather overlapping frameworks that help educators identify the values embedded in curriculum decisions. Understanding these ideologies provides teachers with language to articulate tensions between how they've been taught, how they want to teach, and how institutional constraints shape their practice.

Using curriculum ideologies as lenses for critical reflection and navigating professional tensions.
Rather than using these ideologies to categorize or label curriculum as "good" or "bad," teachers can use them as lenses to examine what they might not be seeing in their own curriculum work. The framework helps educators question their assumptions, identify conflicts between their values and administrative expectations, and hold multiple truths simultaneously without judgment. By understanding curriculum as operating on three levels—institutional (policies and standards), programmatic (materials and products), and classroom (the lived experience between teachers and students)—educators can better navigate the complex decisions about what to teach, why it matters, and how to structure learning experiences.

---

Taking Action

• Use the four curriculum ideologies as lenses to examine your own curriculum practices and ask: What am I not seeing in my work here? What values are being communicated through my curricular choices?
• Practice "unknowing and not knowing"—acknowledge ambivalence and recognize that multiple perspectives can be true simultaneously without canceling each other out
• When facing curriculum tensions, use the framework to identify whether conflicts stem from competing ideologies rather than personal failings or student deficits
• Create space for meaningful deliberation about curriculum decisions with colleagues, using these ideologies as a common language to discuss the "why" behind the "what" and "how"
• Reflect on who decides what knowledge matters in your classroom and consider how power and decision-making are distributed in your curricular choices

Summary assisted by Cleanvoice (2024 Cleanvoice AI) and Claude (Anthropic, 2024) 
​​​​​