Center for the Professional Education of Teachers
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Team
    • Partnerships
    • Signature Initiatives
    • Coaching Philosophy
    • Career Opportunities
  • Upcoming PD
  • K-12 Resources
  • Work with a coach

These Students Can’t...Yet: Unpacking the Progressive Scaffolding Framework

6/7/2022

5 Comments

 
A flexible path toward mastery that provides structured support for students at all levels. 
Picture
ROBERTA LENGER KANG
Instructional Design Specialist
​

When I was growing up, my high school Social Studies teacher had a poster hanging on the wall that read, “If you think you can, or you think you can’t, you’re right.” The message was clear, even to teenagers -- the power to succeed or to reach a new goal is often inside of each of us. As educators, we know that our students’ mindsets play a major role in how hard they try, how much confidence they develop, and how committed they are to reaching their goals. But confidence alone doesn’t get them to a point of mastery. And desire alone won’t develop their skills, or increase their knowledge base, or level up their accuracy or precision. For those changes, our students need structured support!

This structured support often comes in the form of scaffolding. Like the large platforms that help construction workers reach the tall exterior of a building, scaffolding student learning creates platforms of support as teachers incorporate challenging texts, complex tasks, and abstract ideas into their instruction. Scaffolding is critical when holding high expectations and implementing a rigorous curriculum — but scaffolding alone doesn’t develop independent learners. Sometimes, scaffolding can become a crutch that teachers and students use, turning a support into a shackle. As educators, we often spend a lot of our planning time thinking about how to build scaffolds to break learning down into manageable components, but we can’t stop there. We must also consider the ways we gradually release scaffolding so that students can internalize and transfer their knowledge and skills to new tasks and topics. 

A path toward mastery

Our Progressive Scaffolding Framework outlines a path for educators to consider when setting high expectations for students, helping them find that balance between necessary supports and structured enabling. Building on the ideas of Zone of Proximal Development and apprenticeship theories, the framework outlines a path toward mastery in four stages:
​
  • I do, you watch 
  • I do, you help
  • You do, I help
  • You do, I watch​
​
DOWNLOAD: PROGRESSIVE SCAFFOLDING FRAMEWORK

Stage 1: I do, you watch

When introducing new content or skills, we begin with the I do, you watch stage. We initiate this by introducing new concepts alongside prior knowledge, real world examples, or previous units of study. Our goal is to map new information onto our students’ activated schemas so that the new content or skills are contextualized and relevant.

At this stage of instruction, we can prepare and provide a model of the task, using a Think Aloud mini-lesson where we walk our students through an internal thinking process that illustrates how we navigate the task and make decisions. Alternatively, we can outline the explicit steps to complete the task, or provide a roundup of the important information students need to know before diving in.

The I do, you watch process can be presented to students working individually or in small groups. It’s important to remember that even at this stage, students shouldn’t be sitting silently. We always want students actively engaged, so we might add a note taking component, a reflection task, a meta-cognitive class discussion, or an element of inquiry so that students remain intellectually engaged in the process.

​

Stage 2: I do, you help

After laying the groundwork for the task in stage 1, we can move into stage 2, where students begin working with the content and task materials with support. Working in small groups, students might replicate the model with new information, restate or reword the essential steps in their own words, or engage in a small group discussion or group practice as a way to begin experimenting with and internalizing the skills. 

Stage 3: You do, I help

In stage 3, the content and skills should be familiar to students after their initial explorations, and they should be ready to continue in pairs or small groups with more independence. Students are still in the development phase of their learning, so they may need additional support and will benefit from frequent check-ins, and suggested strategies — but here’s where we want to avoid returning to stage 1 supports. We’re looking for students to be engaged in a productive struggle.

Students may benefit from suggestions of “fix up” strategies or options for what to do if they get stuck. At this stage, we want to push students beyond replicating the model or the example by having them practice the skill or apply content with a new format, a new context, or by making connections to other topics within the discipline or beyond.

This is also a great stage to ask students to use one another as resources. While working in pairs and small groups is an excellent way to support students at their level and create opportunities for growth through collaboration, we want to ensure a high level of individual accountability so that some students don’t take on the burden for the group while others opt out of the learning process.

Stage 4: You do, I watch

In stage 4, students have been exposed to new content and skills, they’ve practiced working on a task informally with support, and they’ve begun making connections with other content information or demonstrating their learning through class activities and tasks. At this stage, it’s important to begin removing any unnecessary scaffolds to see what students can do independently.

In the You do, I watch phase, we recommend providing a short review of the process and previous work done up to this point in the learning experience. After the review, we can be clear with students that they’re ready to try it out on their own. Provide a clear task and an adequate amount of time to complete the task (3-4 times as long as it would take you to do it).

Students who are able to take on this challenge and demonstrate their skills individually prove that they’re meeting the expectations of the task and are ready to move forward to the next knowledge block or skill sets. Students who struggle at this stage help us to understand where and why they’re struggling, so that we can return to Stage 3 to provide targeted support. 

How long does this take? 

Like an accordion, this process can be expanded or compressed to meet the needs of your grade level and subject area. We might be able to move through the four stages within a single lesson, or it may be an expanded process that is organized across a week’s worth of lesson plans. Consider these two examples: 
​

45-minute Lesson Plan Structure
  5 minutes   |   Opening warm up: Inquiry question
10 minutes   |   I do, you watch: Mini-lesson modeling
10 minutes   |   I do, you help: Stop and jot, turn and talk reflection on the model
15 minutes   |   You do, I help: Small group practice 
  5 minutes   |   You do, I watch: Closing summary formative assessment
Week-long Lesson Structure
      Monday   |   I do, you watch: Introduction, modeling, and reflection 
      Tuesday   |   I do, you help: Small group discussion and practice
Wednesday   |   You do, I help: Small group practice and connections, part 1
    Thursday   |   You do, I help: Small group practice and connections, part 2
          Friday   |   You do, I watch: Independent practice and formative assessment

The process of instruction and assessment is complex, especially when we’re trying to use data to inform instruction and support students who’ve struggled in the past. We want to be mindful to keep forward momentum toward rigorous learning goals while developing a clear path forward for students who begin at every level.

​
​
Picture
DR. ROBERTA LENGER KANG
CPET Center Director & Instructional Design Specialist


Dr. Kang started her coaching career in 2006, after nearly a decade of teaching in Denver, CO and NYC schools. In her role as CPET's Center Director, Roberta cultivates partnerships with schools, districts, and organizations in critical areas of focus, such as: developing academic rigor, refining literacy in high school, creating meaningful instruction for high-stakes assessments, and leveraging city and state mandates for authentic school change. You can reach her at kang@tc.edu.
​​

Picture
Picture
DIFFERENTIATE LIKE A PRO
Picture
RESOURCE: RIGORMETER
Picture
PROMOTE PRODUCTIVE STRUGGLE
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN, RESOURCES
5 Comments
Ali Fazal link
6/14/2022 02:42:02 am

Hey, nice post! Thanks for sharing this information. Keep sharing!

Reply
Nick John link
6/15/2022 06:56:23 am

Hi, great post! I really love the content you have shared. Looking forward to more blogs. Keep updating!

Reply
Abdula Raheem link
6/15/2022 07:19:18 am

Hi, great post! I really love the content you have shared. Looking forward to more blogs.

Reply
Cheryl Gartsbeyn
6/27/2022 05:43:47 am

This article- and especially the lesson plan structures- were really helpful! Thank you!

Reply
Roberta
6/28/2022 08:57:44 pm

Thanks Cheryl! Thanks good to know!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    POPULAR CATEGORIES
    21st century skills
    Assessment
    Classroom culture
    Curriculum
    Data-driven instruction
    Differentiation
    Equity
    Instructional design
    Leadership
    Literacy
    Project-based learning
    Reading
    Resources
    Student engagement
    Writing

The Center for Professional Education of Teachers (CPET) at Teachers College, Columbia University is devoted to advancing global capacities in teacher education, research, and whole school reform. CPET advocates for excellence and equity in education through direct service to youth and educators, innovative school projects, international research that examines and advocates the highest quality instructional and assessment practices today, and sustainable school partnerships that leverage current policy and mandates to raise literacy levels and embed collaborative communities of learning. Uniting theory and practice, CPET promotes rigorous and relevant scholarship and is committed to making excellent education accessible worldwide.
​
Center for Professional Education of Teachers 
525 West 120th Street, Box 182 New York, NY 10027
416 Zankel Hall
Phone: (212) 678-3161 | Fax: (212) 678-6631
Email: cpet@tc.edu
Picture
Picture
WORK WITH A COACH

CPET
© 2021, Center for Professional Education of Teachers
This website uses cookies as well as similar tools and technologies to understand visitors’ experiences. By continuing to use this website, you consent to Teachers
​College, Columbia University’s usage of cookies and similar technologies, in accordance with the Teachers College, Columbia University Website Cookie Notice.
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Team
    • Partnerships
    • Signature Initiatives
    • Coaching Philosophy
    • Career Opportunities
  • Upcoming PD
  • K-12 Resources
  • Work with a coach